“The ego’s goal is […] autonomy. Its
purpose is to be separate [...]. It is the
symbol of separation.”
-A Course in
Miracles
The ego is one
thing, but it’s my monkey mind that expends my energies and sends me off on
tangents. I spend so much time assigning parallel tasks, and then it comes back with these brilliant ideas that
are way more interesting than whatever is going on in my world.
“We harvest the sweet potatoes
from the fields next door…”
“We coat sand to crack the
earth…”
“We distill alcohol...”
Actually, this
stuff is pretty interesting. My early
days in manufacturing allow me to like processes,watching disparate
parts make something useful. The other
day I was watching a video that our team created for a grocery store
distributor. I welled up a few times
while these fit but sweaty young
men raced pallet jacks to stack goods. Together, humans make it all work and inadvertently
meet each other’s needs. What would the world be like if we all won the lottery? Who would make my 1/2 Caf, Skim, heavy froth, upside-down Caramel Machiatto? Who? One of the other millionaires? I don't think so.
In the
meantime, this is what my monkey mind hears:
“I hate when my mom puts marshmallows
on the sweet potatoes unless they get that crispy carbon coat like when we were
on the beach and made a trash can of hurricanes.”
The truth is— it’s
not my ego but my monkey that separates me from my pursuits. It's like
a beacon, always scanning the perimeter and looking for things to get
into. It's the reason I find reasons to be embarrassed about being gay. Unfortunately, I’m a bit of an
empath, so it picks up on other people’s energies and I briefly borrow their homophobia. Being a pseudo-psychic lesbian can make a
person say things that sane people don’t say.
And, it’s my ego that saves me
from making a fool of myself. It has integrity.
The Molotov
cocktail is perfectly stirred whenever my monkey mind seduces my ego. Logic races against the clock like the almost-hero in "The Hindenburg." It must turn back the hands of time and separate the parts of “us” before the bomb explodes.
Thinking of this idea—that the ego is separate—makes me realize that my monkey mind is separate too. I think the author of the Course of Miracles (who was heavily influenced by “the Voice” and a man with a PhD from a formidable institution) got it wrong. There are lots of mes who are doing lots of things. So, I have to disagree with the quote, but I often disagree with scriptures written by humans when they don’t proof their pudding. Truth has to be sound, I say.
Thinking of this idea—that the ego is separate—makes me realize that my monkey mind is separate too. I think the author of the Course of Miracles (who was heavily influenced by “the Voice” and a man with a PhD from a formidable institution) got it wrong. There are lots of mes who are doing lots of things. So, I have to disagree with the quote, but I often disagree with scriptures written by humans when they don’t proof their pudding. Truth has to be sound, I say.
“Ego is not an enemy to be broken or
demolished […]. We don’t want to get rid
of the ego, we want to soften it, make it porous and receptive, so information,
thoughts, and compassion flow in and out.” -If
the Buddha Dated
This sounds nice and it makes more
sense to me—assimilate the ego—, but the
title of the chapter is “Be Guided By Spirit, Not Ego," and she spends more time
on the “rigid ego” and “inflated ego” than the healthy ego. I have to say, I think she’s speaking from the popular
position which is pound the ego. Worse, I think
she’s derailing from her message—which overall is great throughout the book—for the purpose of introducing a concept that was birthed by a man who has a completely different
world view than most people on this planet. If everyone has an ego, mine is different than Freud’s. (I would
like to strongly encourage all the ladies to take their ego out for a walk, once a day and get to know it, find out what it's got cooking.)
Maybe the people who are outspoken
about pounding the ego have egos that need to be wrestled like a 100-foot
python that’s wrapped around and ready to swallow. If that’s truly their problem, I say pound it
into submission and get its attention.
But, for me and for most lesbians that I’ve met—even Bear when she has
that wooing confidence—, we don’t need to pound any part. In fact, I would say that we need to invite the personalized ego out and say, “I’ve missed you old friend, and I’m sorry that I didn’t
listen—since, ummm, 6th grade—when you said I was smart enough to be a
rocket scientist, or doctor or lawyer.”
I’m stoked that
I’ve had >300 hits in 1 ½ weeks; but, I’ve only had a
handful of comments and I
think that 90% of the comments are from non-lesbians.
(That’s a words you don’t hear often!)
I had to ask my non-lesbian Dim Sum friend (who still doesn’t have an
alias) if she thinks lesbians have been conditioned to
not contribute to public opinions. Maybe
we’ve done such a good job as females, minorities, and slanderously-labeled degenerates that we’ve learned to not speak first or to not speak at all. I hope this isn't true.
Lesbians have much to offer the world.
Most of us live in predominantly female groupings, so we’re more in touch
with our Goddess nature than heterosexual females who continually swap energy with
males. Is that a stretch?
I heard a statistic
once that Lesbians and Gays make up 50% of the health care industry. That’s a ludicrous statement but it’s
probably a higher percentage than the 5-10% of the population which is our statistic. So, I Google’d “What percentage of…”
and am offered a list of options. I
continued with, “What percentage of lesbians…” Nothing.
Google offered nothing. That’s
not right. We should have at least 1
statistic on Google—just one.
It would be good if feminine power could manifest, and influence collective thought more often. Let’s
empower our dormant and/or discarded egos, pick something that is unique to our
minority, and populate this question for Google.
Where should we start?
We have much untapped time, love, tenderness to offer the world. So, when you're out with your ego in the park or mall, look around and ask, “What percentage of lesbians can the world do without?”
We have much untapped time, love, tenderness to offer the world. So, when you're out with your ego in the park or mall, look around and ask, “What percentage of lesbians can the world do without?”
Okay...you asked...your non-lesbian friend: Dim Sum. "Are lesbians so overlooked that they've been conditioned to not contribute to public opinions?"
ReplyDeleteOnly the readers of your blog can answer...
1.Do you feel overlooked? YES/NO
2.Do you fill conditioned to not contribute? YES/NO
3.Does responding to a blog make you feel like you're making a public spectical of yourself? YES/NO/NOT SURE
4.What ever your answers to 1-3 are...WHY?
I think this "nut"--speaking up/posting a comment/going public--needs to be cracked before anyone can utter a statement, a paragraph, or short story about dating from a lesbian's point of view.
Just curious...Dim Sim signing out for now
Hey Dim Sum,
ReplyDeleteIt's about getting on the dance floor with your partner first, or maybe you and I are really excited- imagine that!
I was tooling around with the Stats page. It lets you see what URL is looking you up (All- don't worry, it doesn't show people's personal URL/ISPs. It shows fake URLS that redirect to real servers that I can't see). There's one called "best-blogs info" which made me wonder if Blogspot sets this link for every blog so it can track up and coming newbies. Of course, that made me excited to think that a lesbian blog could be a popular site, contending with mainstream numbers. But, I followed it and it takes me to Monsterjobs.com. Wouldn't it be great if I could get a job for being a lesbian? Hmmm. That opens up a whole different can of worms that I didn't think about when I started this conversation, ")